Alek wrote:
> And it was M35/2.8 lens for sure? test was done about 15 year ago I think. > Even better than Zeiss? I asked since many people believe K 35mm lenses are alegedly >much better. I find this a bit weird as I assume (correct me if I'm wrong) the M 35/2.8 is optically identical to the A 35/2.8, the latter among Pentax weaker efforts (probably in the league with the A 28/2.8 and A 135/2.8 lenses). According to tests I've seen the A 35/2 is apparently even worse. Pal
