[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > But I shot some portraits and they looked very good.So where is the problem? > How to describe bokeh in other words? > Alek
First, you have to learn what "bokeh" is. A very good article on "bokeh" is located at: http://www.trenholm.org/hmmerk/ATVB.pdf Keith Whaley > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisa3: > >> Yep, but at the same time, the lens is reknown to have a harsh > >> bokeh. Which is not important to all of us and certainly not to > >> N*k*n users. > > > >Yes, the K 105/2.8 is a sharp lens, but (unfortunately) so is its > >bokeh: > > > >http://www.cetussoft.com/pentax/k105f28/ > > > >[Make sure you're sitting down before you click on the "Some plants > >at f/2.8" link - <g>.] > > > >In general, I like the ol' SMC K lenses a lot. I liked this lens, > >too, ~except~ for its bokeh. However, bokeh is important to me in a > >100-ish lens, which I would often be using for portraits, so I sent > >my K 105/2.8 on to another home... > > > >Fred
