Thanks! But shootig at infinity K105/2.8 should give great results I think. I nearly only shoot in this way so maybe that is why I did not observed the problem. Do you have this lens? Alek Użytkownik Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> But I shot some portraits and they looked very good.So where is the problem? >> How to describe bokeh in other words? >> Alek > >First, you have to learn what "bokeh" is. >A very good article on "bokeh" is located at: > >http://www.trenholm.org/hmmerk/ATVB.pdf > >Keith Whaley > >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisa3: >> >> Yep, but at the same time, the lens is reknown to have a harsh >> >> bokeh. Which is not important to all of us and certainly not to >> >> N*k*n users. >> > >> >Yes, the K 105/2.8 is a sharp lens, but (unfortunately) so is its >> >bokeh: >> > >> >http://www.cetussoft.com/pentax/k105f28/ >> > >> >[Make sure you're sitting down before you click on the "Some plants >> >at f/2.8" link - <g>.] >> > >> >In general, I like the ol' SMC K lenses a lot. I liked this lens, >> >too, ~except~ for its bokeh. However, bokeh is important to me in a >> >100-ish lens, which I would often be using for portraits, so I sent >> >my K 105/2.8 on to another home... >> > >> >Fred > --------------r-e-k-l-a-m-a-----------------
Masz dość płacenia prowizji bankowi ? mBank - załóż konto http://epieniadze.onet.pl/mbank
