Do you know if Nikkor 105/2.5 is better/worse than Pentax 105? Alek [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał: >Thanks! >But shootig at infinity K105/2.8 should give great results I think. I nearly only >shoot in this way so maybe that is why I did not observed the problem. >Do you have this lens? >Alek >Użytkownik Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> >>> But I shot some portraits and they looked very good.So where is the problem? >>> How to describe bokeh in other words? >>> Alek >> >>First, you have to learn what "bokeh" is. >>A very good article on "bokeh" is located at: >> >>http://www.trenholm.org/hmmerk/ATVB.pdf >> >>Keith Whaley >> >>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisa3: >>> >> Yep, but at the same time, the lens is reknown to have a harsh >>> >> bokeh. Which is not important to all of us and certainly not to >>> >> N*k*n users. >>> > >>> >Yes, the K 105/2.8 is a sharp lens, but (unfortunately) so is its >>> >bokeh: >>> > >>> >http://www.cetussoft.com/pentax/k105f28/ >>> > >>> >[Make sure you're sitting down before you click on the "Some plants >>> >at f/2.8" link - <g>.] >>> > >>> >In general, I like the ol' SMC K lenses a lot. I liked this lens, >>> >too, ~except~ for its bokeh. However, bokeh is important to me in a >>> >100-ish lens, which I would often be using for portraits, so I sent >>> >my K 105/2.8 on to another home... >>> > >>> >Fred >> >--------------r-e-k-l-a-m-a----------------- > >Masz dość płacenia prowizji bankowi ? >mBank - załóż konto >http://epieniadze.onet.pl/mbank > --------------r-e-k-l-a-m-a-----------------
Masz dość płacenia prowizji bankowi ? mBank - załóż konto http://epieniadze.onet.pl/mbank
