Hi,

Saturday, December 28, 2002, 10:59:48 PM, you wrote:

> I'm talking about square images, not the role of the square in composition...
> Square images are rare. 

not as rare as you make out. I've already stated that over 57% of the
Christmas cards I've received this year are square images. I have big
books of photos by David Bailey, Skrebneski, Doisneau and others full
of square photos, I have shelves full of books about art full of
square paintings, I have books full of square designs, racks of CDs
with square images on the covers, I live in a city full of museums
full of square paintings, where the architecture of many of the buildings
is based on the cube. It's everywhere when you start looking for it.
For camera makers not to support it as a viewfinder proportion would
be a travesty and a tragedy.

---

 Bob  

"Our heads are round so that our thoughts can fly in any direction"
Francis Picabia

Reply via email to