Tom wrote: > Let's see, Pal is saying that 6x6 is a waste of film because it has to > cropped to 6x4.5 to fit his idea of a proper format? Now he is saying that > it is not a waste to crop 6x7 to 6x4.5, nor 6x4.5 to 4.5x3.5 in reply to > Bruce's comment.
No I'm not. I'm saying its a waste to use a format you end up cropping anyway and that the 6X6 format has no advantage over, say, the 6X7 format when it comes to cropping. > Me thinks, Pal is just not willing to admit he is wrong about anything. He > would rather come across as being absurd than admit he hadn't thought > something through all the way. Me thinks you don't understand what I'm saying. P�l
