Yes Fred.
I didnot mean ugly in a bad way.Its just it is completley differnt from all the earlier
cameras.It took me
a bit to get used to it,but once i did i liked it.I like the big grip built into the
body.Even though i have
small chunky hands,it fits nicely.Balances well with the Sigma 100-300 i have.
Not fond of the 35-70 that came with it,so i may look into a 28-90 or some thing like
that.
I only use it on specific horse events so i don't give it a hard work out.Maybe 6-10
rolls
per year.
(What i'm getting at is i'm keeping it<G>
Dave
> > (Is ugly isn't it)
>
> I just did a "double take" on your post, Dave. Are you referring to
> the "exquisite beauty" of the SF1/SFX ?
>
> Personally, I find the appearance of something like a KX or and ME
> Super or (especially) an LX to be rather beautiful. And, until I
> started learning about the merits of the SF1/SFX (and of the nicely
> improved SF1n/SFXn), I tended to not care at all for the looks of
> these "ergonomic" (?) bodies. However, as of late, I've had some
> fun playing with an SFX and an SFXn, and I've learned to respect
> them ("functional styling" and all) a lot more. (But, no, I'm not
> trading in my LX's - <g>.)
>
> Fred
>
