Sounds like the beginning of another argument about rules and standards that I really don't want to get in to. I use whatever feels right, and not what some half-arsed rule says should be right (i.e. that a 50mm is the 'standard' lens - which is convention more than anything).
Cheers
Shaun
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I've heard it's an outstanding lens but isnt 24mm a little too wide to be a "standard" lens? JCO-----Original Message-----
From: Shaun Canning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 5:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fast Wide Angle?
Images taken with the FA* 24mm have an almost 3D 'look' to them Joe, which I have never seen with any other 24mm. I have only had mine for a little while, but I love it already. It is my new standard lens on my LX.
Cheers
Shaun
.
-- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Shaun Canning Cultural Heritage Services High Street, Broadford, Victoria, 3658. www.heritageservices.com.au/ Phone: 0414-967644 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
