Thanks for the infor Paul... Think I'll pass I have the 28 covered in too 
many ways already. Unless it is exceptional I won't bother...

In a message dated 1/8/03 6:51:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

>Vic wrote: Speaking of fast wide angles. I've been eyeing a Kiron 28/f2
>for
>a while. It's $75 Cdn in mint. Worth getting??
>
>I used to own the Kiron. While sharp, it lacked contrast and color
>saturation. I believe distortion was somewhat noticeable, too. However,
>it
>was well-made and operated as smoothly as a Pentax.
>
>It the Kiron's specs, size, and price appeal to you, you might try the
>Vivitar 28/2K Close Focus, which came out a couple years later. Both use
>floating elements and can be found in PK and PKA mount. They look the same;
>both use 55mm filters. But the Vivitar may be a bit better. I say this
>because two or three have said it's nearly as good as the legendary Vivitar
>Series One 28/1.9K, which I kept over my Pentax SMC 28/2K.
>
>If you go with the Vivitar, make sure it's the Close Focus model, 55mm
>model, whose closest focus mark, like the Kiron's, is 1 foot (0.3 m). Some
>specimens say CF on the front for Close Focus; others don't. Avoid the
>Vivitar 28/2 that uses a 49mm filter. It's not the same lens, even if it
>focuses as close.
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to