In a message dated 1/9/2003 9:00:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> An FA 400 2.8 for 35mm. > > -R I'd go with that -- something good for wild life photography that would not also break the bank. I am hampered by the fact I am not sure what lenses they currently make (so many old ones floating around and being a novice, et. all.). Or a FA 300 2.8 for 35mm. They may have that. But point is moot, probably both would be outside my price range -- unless I could find them used. I've been looking at old manual primes in those focal lengths. Look heavy. Heavy is less and less attractive. So I second Ryan. Doe aka Marnie :-) > > Mike Johnston wrote: > > Okay, time for a group question. > > > > If you could direct Pentax to make and market one lens it currently does not > > make, what would it be? > > > > (Focal length, max aperture range, MF or AF, for what camera, imaging > > characteristics you'd want, and any other special > qualities or > > specifications you want to mention.) > > > > --Mike
