> my vision isn't B&W and never has been, so they always look like they are
> lacking something to me. In newspapers and books that don't print a lot of
> color, okay. But even that has changed over time.

Gee, Marnie, up till now I liked you! <s>

Just kidding. Actually I respect your viewpoint, even though I personally
have always reacted exactly the opposite. As I said in one essay on the
subject, "Tones move me. Colors don't. I don't know why." I even went out
and bought a B&W TV as a second TV.


> phooey to any broad generalizations re photography. It really
> depends on the picture.

Bravo. And if everyone had the same taste, the world would really be boring.

--Mike

Reply via email to