1 stop is worth it to some, but I much prefer another
100mm so get a 400mm F5.6 instead :-)


 --- Christian Skofteland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Welcome to the
list, Waldemar!
> 
> I am also an avid bird watcher.  Currently, my
> longest lens is a 300/4 Sigma 
> AF APO Macro which I am very fond of.  I was
> debating between this lens and 
> the SMC M 300/4 but decided on the Sigma for it's
> tripod collar (lots of 
> discussions have been on the topic of tripod
> collars....  I won't get into 
> that right now) and close-focus abilities.  The
> costs of the two lenses at 
> the time I was searching (used) was almost
> identical.
> 
> to answer your main question: Yes, the extra stop in
> my opinion would be 
> worth the price difference.  Sure you can use film
> that is one stop faster (I 
> use Velvia and Provia 100F slide film) but I would
> be unhappy with the films 
> available (provia 400F is fine for sports but I
> don't like it for nature 
> shots and I don't really like Sensia at all).
> 
> If I was on a budget and looking for a 300mm I'd
> find an SMC-M 300/4 or a 
> Sigma like mine (depending on your brand loyalties,
> etc) and definitely stay 
> with a K-mount lens.
> 
> HTH
> Christian
> 
> On Wednesday 15 January 2003 13:49,  W. Krasowski
> wrote:
> > Hello to everyone,
> >
> > I am new to pdml, but found it very usefull - many
> thanks to all of you
> > for doing such great job!
> >
> > I am passionate birdwatcher, I love Pentax system
> and use my MZ5N body.
> > Now I look for proper lens for my
> bird-photography. I don't need longer
> > than 300mm lens, so I consider buying old Takumar
> 300/4.0 SMC, screw mount
> > lens. Would anybody tell me please if it is as
> good and sharp as I've
> > heard? I couldn't find any resolution table for
> this lens, does anybody
> > know it? And - is it better than K-mount 300mm/4.0
> lens or not?
> >
> > Another one I would love to have is F* 300mm/4,5
> but it will costs me two
> > times more money (at least). Anyway, I would buy
> this F* if it is really
> > much, much better than those Takumar.
> >
> > Another thing that makes me very surprised is that
> lenses as fast as 2,8
> > are thousands of dollars more expensive than 4,5 -
> is this one f-stop
> > really worth so much money? Especially when I can
> get this one "f-stop"
> > buying faster film.
> >
> > I will appreciate any help.
> >
> > Kind greeting to all of you,
> > =======================
> > Waldemar Krasowski
> > mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > =======================
>  

______________________________________________________________________ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca

Reply via email to