> I have issues with the pixel > "math". Everytime digital vs film comes up, someone brings out their > slide rule and proceed to "prove" that digital is X years away from > equaling film. > > The proof is in the prints, and the prints are looking pretty good.
Amen, Tom. I've been enduring the calculations for ten years now. They're always all over the place, they're always assuming premises unproved, and the conclusions have a very poor historical track record. --Mike
