Mike wrote: > Amen, Tom. I've been enduring the calculations for ten years now. They're > always all over the place, they're always assuming premises unproved, and > the conclusions have a very poor historical track record.
But the argument you are using is like stating that 35mm is as good as medium format because you can't see a difference in the small prints you get from the lab. Using print to evaluate tell you about the printing process. P�l
