on 17.01.03 14:12, T Rittenhouse at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > We though out. However, on your wedding photography comment, I would point > out that digital seems to work for Monte Zucker. > Yes, that's true. But the results? At least in Canadina magazine of pro wedding photographers (Vision, published by Fujifilm Canada) there is still little about the ones making their work using exclusively digital... I suspect that many of these cheaper photo-journalists went digital to went even cheaper... maybe in terms of picture quality too :-)
-- Best Regards Sylwek
