----- Original Message ----- From: "Ryan K. Brooks" Subject: Re: Vs: Vs: Vs: Comparing digital to film
> The 14/32mb argument is a different one, IMHO. And in my experience > with the 1Ds, there's no way it's pulling in less information than > scanned 35mm film. This argument is the subjective one. Finally, an honest response on the subject. What you are saying is that film is limited by the process used to generate an electronic facsimile, not by any inherent failure in the media itself. Since this is what P�l, Rob, myself and a few others have been saying for some time now, it's nice to know that you have come out of your fog on the subject. William Robb
