Rob, The odd thing there is that it sounds to be smaller. Adding an interchangeable back would probably make it larger - like the Mamiya RB. Unless, of course, you didn't count the back in your measurements for the body size.
Bruce Monday, February 3, 2003, 9:38:32 AM, you wrote: RB> But you could put a 645 size sensor on an insert for a 67 based RB> system... RB> 645 sales could be hit by claims that digital has now surpassed this. RB> Perhaps Pentax feel film based medium format has a longer future in 67 RB> format. Not saying I agree, but its possible. RB> Besides the criticism of not having changeable backs came up WELL before RB> the age of digital. Perhaps they are finally adressing it. >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ryan K. Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: 03 February 2003 17:35 >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: New 67 and new generation of K-mount? >> >> >> A digital option for 67 is a joke. You're not going to get anywhere >> near a full frame unless it's megabucks. >> >> They need to start with 35mm, then do 645- which makes a lot >> more sense. >> >> >> Rob Brigham wrote: >> > This would answer the constant criticism of Pentax not having >> > changeable backs perhaps? >> > >> > Man this is going to be a long month... >> > >> > >> >> >>
