Hi, P�l Jensen wrote: > > Alin wrote: > > > Sorry to be carried away - I'm especially bitter about this point > > after seeing how Pentax embraced this trend with the overspecified > > but heavily compromised *ist. > > Heanily compromised? I think not! Even if the more pessimistic > price estimate is correct, the *Ist doesn't seem compromised to > me considering what it costs. It is a very comprehensively > specified camera with almost all features you can think of.
But without support K and M lenses! Sure, you can make the shutter operate (via that custom function), but the meter won't meter properly! You were claiming a few days ago that the FAJ phenomenon is only for the lowest ranks... Cheers, Boz
