physical constraints. In other words you can't pack the photons tight enough for a hand held
device.
At 03:35 PM 2/25/2003 +1100, you wrote:
Yes it may well be a fools game, but categorically stating what can and can not happen in the future is just plain ignorant. As I have said all along, the technology may well be completely different, but we will have gigapixel resolution in digital cameras in the future. I understand the restrictions upon sensor size and sensitivity as it stands now, but we (humble PDMLers) are not really privy to the world of R&D at Pentax, Fuji, Kodak, Nikon, Canon, Foveon, or Intel or AMD or any one of the thousands of other companies who play this game. If sensors can't develop past the theoretical end game of X megapixels, then many of these companies had better start developing other products as they will surely go broke. Thom Hogans article said similar things about the future (or lack thereof) of Kodak.
The bottom line is that I don't really consider it too foolish to think about the future a little and what it may bring. Other people who have the technical and financial resources at their disposal do the same thing...only they call it R&D, and the results of their foolishness are called INNOVATION.
Cheers
Shaun
Bruce Rubenstein wrote:I'm old enough to remember when it was that we'd all be driving around in nuclear powered cars. Predicting technology 10 years out is a fool's game.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.... In 10 years time...
.
-- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Shaun Canning Cultural Heritage Services High Street, Broadford, Victoria, 3658.
www.heritageservices.com.au/
Phone: 0414-967644 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. --Groucho Marx
