I still think that most digital shooters now still want a film-like SLR. Let's face it, almost all (if not all) pro's just switched their Canon & Nikon film cameras for a digital version. Plus, who wants to dump all there Canon & Nikon glasss for what? 2-4 lenses from Olympus? Plus they'd need a pro service, many more lenses and accesories, AND to be field proven. Also, what's the AF like? Do they have IS? Advanced flash? All unknowns.
I don't think many will gamble on this system. If Olympus want to go "pro" they better release a comprehensive system. You can also argue for Pentax in that they have a much more comprehensive system in place already. Also, what is the image quality of the 4/3? How big of a print can you get? It seems also that you'd be stuck with the same sized image sensor. And what are the MP? 5? 6? Sorry I'm being critical, but I just don't see many that would jump on this system. OR I could be eating crow in a month... Peter --- Lukasz Kacperczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just like what has been discussed here before: > Canon > > and Nikon have cornered the pro market and I don't > > think this will change! Minolta tried with 35mm > and > > flopped. > > Well, actually I'm not that sure. Look at the lenses > they're supposed to > show - two of them are very long teles. I think a > smaller body and compact > long lenses could appeal to sports and nature > photographers (especially the > latter - no need to haul around very heavy gear). > That is, of course, if the > quality of the pictures is high enough and the > camera materializes at all. > > My 2 cents. > > Regards, > Lukasz > > --------------r-e-k-l-a-m-a----------------- > > Szukasz banku bez prowizji ? > mBank - zaloz konto > http://epieniadze.onet.pl/mbank > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/
