On 10 Mar 2003 at 23:42, Ryan K. Brooks wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In a message dated 3/10/03 11:17:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > > >>I'm not sure I follow you here, but it's probably just me. If you want > >>to get an IS lens, certainly Canon are presently the folks with the goods. > >> > >> > >>You may be overestimating IS, though, if you think it replaces good > > > > technique. > > > >>Doug > > > > I'm with you Doug. I could care less about IS. My IS comes with three legs and > > it gives me stabilization with all my lenses. > > You can't do with your body what IS does.
Too bad if your subject is moving, IS is not a substitute for fast glass. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html Pentax user since 1986 PDMLer since 1998
