Roland wrote: > In a sense, this is a logical move since the *ist is entry level > (replaces the MZ-60, MZ-7 and MZ-6). I believe that the two more > upmarket models (the replacement for the MZ-3/5n and the MZ-S) will > feature KAF3 with full backwards compatibility.
I don�t see how there could be two more upmarket models since the *ist is already so well featured (better than MZ-5n minus compability) and costs $300. Pentax, prove me wrong! -Matti
