Roland wrote:
> In a sense, this is a logical move since the *ist is entry level > (replaces the MZ-60, MZ-7 and MZ-6). I believe that the two more > upmarket models (the replacement for the MZ-3/5n and the MZ-S) will > feature KAF3 with full backwards compatibility.
I don�t see how there could be two more upmarket models since the *ist is already so well featured (better than MZ-5n minus compability) and costs $300. Pentax, prove me wrong!
-Matti
To be honest I think we can expect a ZX-60 replacement at about $150 and then a MZ-S replacement at $600-800. This would unfortunately mean that we never will se the LX-AF.
Paul
_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
