Hi Ken,

Are you still talking to me?    3:-)

KT Takeshita wrote:
> 
> When Pentax try to make camera bodies as small as possible, as they
> seem to be doing now, focus motor and mechanical aperture coupling
> etc would have nowhere to go and might be squeezed out of the body,
> ending up somewhere in the lens barrel :-).

Unfortunately, this would mean bigger, heavier, and more expensive
lenses...

> Removing that clumsy focus drive shaft penetrating through the lens
> barrel alone will give the lens designer so much freedom to design
> better lenses (I suppose).

This is one reason why Canon has introduced some lenses unmatched by the
others.  With the EF mount, both the aperture and the AF controls are
transferred via flexible wires, so you can place the zoom ring, focusing
ring and aperture mechanism anywhere you want within the lens, and you
don't have to worry about how you would manage the mechanical coupling
with the body (like Pentax and Nikon must do).  Plus an electronic
aperture control is inherently faster, more precise, and less
failure-prone than a mechanical one.

> Hope this is the direction they are going to, and the rumoured new
> series of lenses planned for the fall announcement would be just
> that  :-).

For this I am less than optimistic...  I do not believe in such a move
anyway, but we are now seeing a new lens and camera series, new body
chasis, and you would think, won't you, that if such a radical change
were coming, they would make the switch all at once?

Cheers,
Boz

Reply via email to