>> I wonder if the price of A glass will go up and M down?

> I'm thinking that A prices will go up and Ms and Ks down.

My thoughts, too.  I know that I'm looking at some of my ol' pre-A
lenses "in a new light" (so to speak - <g>).

I've been lucky in one regard -  Over a period of time now I've been
gradually selling a number of my old K and M lenses and/or replacing
them with A lenses (and an occasional F or FA lens, such as the
delightful F* 300/4.5 or the "different" FA* 85/1.4), but this has
not been because of the arrival of the *ist-D.  Rather, it has been
the desire to be able to share some nice lenses with my wife and my
daughter-in-law (for program mode use on their ZX-5n's) that has
driven this gradual transition to A glass.  So, I have been
fortunate to have already migrated quite a bit toward eventual A
lens use on a Pentax digital body without ever having thought of
that reason to change - <g>.

However, I don't need A lenses for the manual exposures and
aperture-priority autoexposures that I take on my film-based Pentax
bodies (LX's, Super A's, ME Supers), and I'm not in any hurry to
give up using those ol' workhorse bodies (and their "ancient"
chemical-based medium) in any hurry.  So, some of my favorite pre-A
lenses will probably remain in the stable here for some time yet.
For example - sure, I've toyed with the idea of replacing my sweet K
200/2.5 with an A* 200/2.8 (a lens I used to have, a few years ago,
too - <g>), but I haven't felt the urge that strongly yet...

Fred


Reply via email to