There has been a lot of rumours about an OSX for PCs. That would mean competing in M$ own market in the same way as Linux. Why not?
DagT > Fra: "Collin Brendemuehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Noting that IBM is building the G5 Macs, it looks like Apple is > (a) no longer able to produce quality products internally > (b) forsaking the general consumer market and going primarily to the > computing professional (an expensive engineering system to compete > with the RS6000) > (c) needing an influx of $ so that M$ doesn't kill the company. > > Too bad. > > My 2c, > > CRB > > >From: Lon Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Interestingly, I read an article about OSX that hinted Apple had > >very easy portability in mind when creating this new OS. The > >rationale in the article was that Apple was getting antsy about > >the long-term survival of the PowerPC processor. > > > >Cameron Hood wrote: > >> Har, har, har! Excellent work, old bean. Now if you could just get a > >> Pentium 4 to run OSX, you'd be really happenin'! > > -- > -- > > Collin Brendemuehl > KC8TKA > > "The problems are so over-rated." > -- Petula Clark > -- > >
