> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kelvin Ang > Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 6:23 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Re[2]: FA 50mm f/1.4 > > > Hi there, > > Thanks for the clarification. I believe I got what you > mean. Does it then make good portraits wide opened? I > guess the 50mm focal length is too short for > comfortable distance between the photographer and the > subject. > > Kelvin > Definately too short. A 100mm to 120mm lens is MUCH better suited for portrait work. Especially head shots. Using a 50mm for headshots is futile and will result in very unflattering views of the subject. JCO - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: FA 50mm f/1.4 Kelvin Ang
- Re: FA 50mm f/1.4 dosk
- What do you shoot with 50mm? (was: FA 50mm f/1.4) Kelvin Ang
- Re: What do you shoot with 50mm? (was: FA 50mm ... PAUL STENQUIST
- Re: Re[2]: What do you shoot with 50mm? (wa... Mark Roberts
- Re: What do you shoot with 50mm? (was: FA 50mm ... dosk
- Re: What do you shoot with 50mm? (was: FA 5... John Glover
- Re: What do you shoot with 50mm? (was: FA 50mm ... Steve Scott
- Re: What do you shoot with 50mm? (was: FA 50mm f/1.... Fabrice Gamberini
- Re: Re[2]: FA 50mm f/1.4 Kelvin Ang
- Re: Re[2]: FA 50mm f/1.4 J. C. O'Connell
- Re: Re[2]: FA 50mm f/1.4 dave o'brien
- RE: Re[2]: FA 50mm f/1.4 Frits J. W�thrich
- Re: Re[2]: FA 50mm f/1.4 Dan Scott
- Re: Re[2]: FA 50mm f/1.4 dave o'brien
- $150 for a 150mm 3.5 ??? J. C. O'Connell
- Re: $150 for a 150mm 3.5 ??? Shel Belinkoff
- Re: $150 for a 150mm 3.5 ??? William Robb
- Re: $150 for a 150mm 3.5 ??? Shel Belinkoff
- Re: $150 for a 150mm 3.5 ??? Rob Studdert
- Re: $150 for a 150mm 3.5 ??? Ken Archer

