A scroll of mail from Dan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:21:10 -0600 Read it? y >I think the answer to that is actually, "It depends." A 50mm is well suited >for portraits with two people in them. And it also works well for an >environmental portrait. Does this one work? http://www.diaspoir.demon.co.uk/images/people/irish-eyes.jpg FA50/f1.4 @ f8, studio flashes, taken at minimum focus distance. i.e., I'm about a foot away from her face. Scanned from an 8x10. dave - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: FA 50mm f/1.4 dosk
- What do you shoot with 50mm? (was: FA 50mm f/1.4) Kelvin Ang
- Re: What do you shoot with 50mm? (was: FA 50mm ... PAUL STENQUIST
- Re: Re[2]: What do you shoot with 50mm? (wa... Mark Roberts
- Re: What do you shoot with 50mm? (was: FA 50mm ... dosk
- Re: What do you shoot with 50mm? (was: FA 5... John Glover
- Re: What do you shoot with 50mm? (was: FA 50mm ... Steve Scott
- Re: What do you shoot with 50mm? (was: FA 50mm f/1.... Fabrice Gamberini
- Re: Re[2]: FA 50mm f/1.4 Kelvin Ang
- RE: Re[2]: FA 50mm f/1.4 J. C. O'Connell
- RE: Re[2]: FA 50mm f/1.4 dave o'brien
- RE: Re[2]: FA 50mm f/1.4 Frits J. W�thrich
- Re: Re[2]: FA 50mm f/1.4 Dan Scott
- Re: Re[2]: FA 50mm f/1.4 dave o'brien
- $150 for a 150mm 3.5 ??? J. C. O'Connell
- Re: $150 for a 150mm 3.5 ??? Shel Belinkoff
- Re: $150 for a 150mm 3.5 ??? William Robb
- Re: $150 for a 150mm 3.5 ??? Shel Belinkoff
- Re: $150 for a 150mm 3.5 ??? Rob Studdert
- Re: $150 for a 150mm 3.5 ??? Ken Archer

