On Monday, September 29, 2003, at 10:52 AM, graywolf wrote:
Now the istD has a 95% viewfinder magnification that is the same as an MX.
Minor point - the magnification of the MX is actually 0.97x, the coverage is 95%. These are two different parameters, measuring different things.
Of course, all I care about is that the finder in my MX looks "big" (a technical term there). Furthermore, as far as I'm concerned, a "normal" lens is the one I use normally - which in my case is a 50, but I could see myself liking something a bit wider.
-Matt
