Hi!

Odd? Only odd? How about just plain silly? Landscape has always been my
busmans holiday passtime, and I don't think I have ever used a lens with
that field of view.
Ferget the 100mm, macro or otherwise for 35mm landscape.


William Robb

Bill, I must remind you that English is not my native language, no matter how good I may seem in it <grin>. I was afraid to use word "silly" because it is just a little step away from "stupid" which in turn is quite offensive, at least to me.


I did however shot quite recently a landscape, well, actually a cityscape, with my Tak Bayonet 135/2.5. The results would be ready some time later.

But still, indeed 100 mm is usually useless for landscape.

And of course all is in 35 mm realm.

Boris.

Reply via email to