>I tend to disagree with you both. I find the narrower view of something like a 100mm lens nice for picking out details. I readily admit that landscape photography is not really my thing, but I think there is more to it then sweeping panoramics.
I agree wholeheartedly. Panoramics are good for some things, but I like to pick out the details as well. Attempt to capture little bits of essence of the scene. That can be with macro or not. Like recent beach shooting, also photographing some seaweed. I think if done right, focusing on some limited, smaller aspects of the landscape can somehow convey the WHOLE landscape. Because that is what our eye tends to do, sweep the scene then focus in on the details. Well, it's a working theory anyway. And one I will keep trying to prove to myself. Marnie aka Doe
