Have I missed something here. Did someone suggest a 100mm would be useless for a landscape. That's so far from the truth that I can't believe someone would say that. And if someone is saying that a 100 mm macro is useless for landscape it's almost as absurd. 100 mm is the perfect landscape lens allowing the photographer to get a more intimate landscape with a different perspective. Wide angles are not the only lenses to use for landscapes and most people who use them for landscapes don't use them effectively. Vic
I did however shot quite recently a landscape, well, actually a cityscape, with my Tak Bayonet 135/2.5. The results would be ready some time later. But still, indeed 100 mm is usually useless for landscape. And of course all is in 35 mm realm. Boris.
