Well, you need to get some light directly into the eyes to get the specular reflections. You could try directing the flash more towards the subject in the tub, or use something like an omni-bounce on the flash head to bounce the light. With your setup using a slave flash, you might be able to diffuse the on-camera flash a bit more and point it downwards, while still getting enough fill from the second flash.

Just my ideas...

-Mat

Simon King wrote:
Hi All,

I've been having a problem recently with eye highlights - or rather the lack
of them, and wondered if anyone had any suggestions.
A good example of the problem I've been having are some photo's of my son in
the bath over the weekend. Here are some rough scans from the prints... http://members.iinet.net.au/~celsim/bath/bath.htm
The bathroom has a white ceiling, so I used a camera mounted flash directed
to bounce off the ceiling and trigger another slave set up to give plenty of
light. With the camera set up in portrait orientation I also attached my trusty
white plastic card to the flash in an attempt to get an eye highlight (see
bottom of web page). I shot at 1/125, f/11 and f/16
All the shots were taken via remote so I could both keep an eye on him and
have him relax and play naturally.


It didn't work - only the tiniest light reflection (see enlargement on
second row).

What's wrong? I generally don't use full frontal flash because of the
dreaded red-eye and the flat look of it. Is there a general rule about how
far the flash needs to be from the lens axis to avoid red-eye but get a
highlight?

Where possible I use an umbrella, and have always been pleased with the
results, but there are times where it's not practical to set it up.
I thought of the following options;
Increase the size of the bounce card.
Have him look more toward the camera.
Use direct flash as well as bounce.

Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Simon




Reply via email to