On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Mark Roberts wrote: > "george de fockert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I have yet to find a M-lens which (optical) outperforms the K lens it > >replaced. > > Try the M300/4.0 and M50/1.7
The M50/1.7 didn't exactly replace any particular K lens, did it? Perhaps it could count as replacing the 55/1.8 but I really think the conceptual replacement for that is the M 50/2.
