[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Mark Roberts wrote: > >> "george de fockert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >I have yet to find a M-lens which (optical) outperforms the K lens it >> >replaced. >> >> Try the M300/4.0 and M50/1.7 > >The M50/1.7 didn't exactly replace any particular K lens, did it? > >Perhaps it could count as replacing the 55/1.8
Well, yes, it was the direct replacement for that lens in Pentax's product line. >but I really think the conceptual replacement for that is the M 50/2. The M50/2.0 was their replacement for the K 55/2.0. That the K55/1.8 and K55/2.0 were essentially the same lens internally doesn't affect their pricing or place in the product line. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
