Yes, the "candids" are done with portable strobes in most cases, but that did not sound like what he original poster was asking about.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I stand by my reply. His post makes no sense. You cant really do studio strobes at weddings and receptions. His "teachers" must be the stupid jerks.....
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message----- From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 12:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: correct exposure
----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: correct exposure
I guess it's possible but VERY unlikely that many people would be working that way for a wedding/reception. In my experince, no matter how much I warn/persuede the bride/groom in advance, the wedding day is always hectic/fast paced and that type of slow deliberate photography is out of the question. I always used non-TTL autoflash, Fuji NPH, and one stop over (iso 200) and got nice results. To each his own I guess....
You stupid, bombastic jerk. Here is the original post that I was replying to.
"Hi All,
I'm currently doing a course in wedding photography. One of the things that came up and which I forgot to ask was: we were told that the studio lights had been set for f/11 and that we should set our cameras to f/8, why is this so?
Thanks, Feroze"
Get it? He's talking about stdio lights. As in STUDIO LIGHTS!!!! Did your mother have any children that developed intelligence?
William Robb
-- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com
"You might as well accept people as they are, you are not going to be able to change them anyway."
