Rob wrote: RS> as an aliasing artifact on the high contrast boarder. It looks like it may be a RS> combination of adjacent pixel spill (due to the high contrast transition) and RS> the lens aberrations.
The 100/2.8 Macro being too contrasty for the sensor? Maybe that's all there is about FAJ - lowered contrast for digital compatibility!? ;o) Now seriously, if it were for the chromatic aberrations then we should have seen blue outer edges and red inner edges (with respect to the frame center). And it's still too close to the center for colour fringe - certainly the lens is much better corrected than that. I believe this is an exclusively digital artifact. Servus, Alin RS> I would have thought that the FA100/2.8 macro would have been pretty well RS> corrected for chromatic aberrations? I'd be keen to try my Voigtländer Macro RS> APO-Lanthar 125mm F2.5 SL, I might get a chance when I meet with Christian next RS> week.
