on 23.10.03 14:52, Rob Brigham at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ah, OK I get it now. I knew I managed to come to an understanding first > time round - it just escaped me this time. > I had just different approach to this matter ;-) Anyway great - I managed to explain what was on my mind ;-) You didn't respond to my question - how does your FA 24-90 perform with *istD? Thanks!
-- Best Regards Sylwek
