You have a choice then: Buy a Foveon DSLR or set sharpening to +1 in camera.
Another way would be to use IRFanView, set up a batch processing configuration which does whatever resizing you want for your 'thoughtless' printing and applies a standard USM at the same time. Then you would have absolutely zero processing to do in photoshop. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 06 November 2003 17:03 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Pentax *ist D vs. Fujifilm S2 Pro: final update > > > >Do all *ist D users have access to NASA labs? That's fine! > > >Dario > > You know I've been reading reviews of the 10D (and the > *istD). Well, mainly > studying the reviews at dpreview more. I hadn't really looked > in depth yet. And > complaints about the 10D images are the same. Too soft. Have > to sharpen. > > I guess I am coming late into this, since I haven't been > paying THAT much > attention. (Since my DSLR purchase date is still off in the > future.) So, sort of > ignorant here. (Well, actually that's fairly common for me re > photography, no > matter the arena. :-)) > > But I don't want to have to do a lot of post processing. > > I.E. Have to sharpen every image I shoot. Some I'd just like, > bang, shoot, > open in Elements and print. I often do that now from scanning > slides. I mean, > sometimes I sharpen or edit, but not always. > > I don't know what the solution is, frankly. Maybe better > sensors. Maybe > better software. Don't know. > > But I hope that something evolves so people don't have to > post process every > image. Otherwise, well, might as well take all digital images > to a lab -- or > spend hours and hours doing it one's self, which sort of > negates some of the > gain of a DSLR. > > At least for me. > > Marnie aka Doe Awaiting developments/evolution. > >
