You've been gone way too long! If you'd have been here, you'd know that it was arbitrarily decided that photographs cannot be made with digital cameras. I won't say who made that decision. They know who they are. <VBG>

Len
---
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1



From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: I feel like Mike Johnston
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 04:47:08 -0800
I've been back on the list for a short while, and am (almost) stunned to
find so many messages about digital imaging.  The messages I've read had
little, if anything, to do with photography, at least in the sense that
I've come to know photography over these past four decades or so.  Bits,
bytes, EXIF's, and all sorts of jargon that is arcane and which I cannot
see, except in a rather tangential way, as having much to do with
traditional photography.  By that I mean making photographs, not digi v
film.  Now, don't get me wrong - I use a digital camera, and am very
much interested in how I can use pixels to make my photographs, yet I
believe there's far too much talk about the intricacies and subtleties
of how a RAW becomes a TIFF, for example, and far too little discussion
- or action - about the art and skill of making a photograph.

_________________________________________________________________
Send a QuickGreet with MSN Messenger http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/cdp_games




Reply via email to