Re: Defining "previously Published" for a photo contest

[Paul Stenquist]

I sell a lot of photographs to magazines. I have never had a problem 
with "previously published" unless the photo appeared on a printed page 
in another mag. No one that I know worries about photos that have 
appeared in obscure places on the net. Thus, PUG photos are not 
published, at least not in my world.
On Sunday, November 16, 2003, at 07:21 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:

On 16 Nov 2003 at 17:50, Paul Stenquist wrote:

The PUG is an informal sharing of photographs, much like showing it to
our neighbor. There is no compensation, therefore it is not published.
Sorry there are plenty of instances where work is published without 
the author
attaining payment for the work, consider the publication of medical 
research
for instance (ie a study on the reason that belly button lint is very 
often
blue/gray in colour :-)

Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998