Paul Stenquist wrote: > I sell a lot of photographs to magazines. I have never had a problem > with "previously published" unless the photo appeared on a printed page > in another mag. No one that I know worries about photos that have > appeared in obscure places on the net. Thus, PUG photos are not > published, at least not in my world.
I'd not worry about it if I were merely submitting to be published -- it is the contest "rules are rules" thing that can get a little dicey. ann > > On Sunday, November 16, 2003, at 07:21 PM, Rob Studdert wrote: > > > On 16 Nov 2003 at 17:50, Paul Stenquist wrote: > > > >> The PUG is an informal sharing of photographs, much like showing it to > >> our neighbor. There is no compensation, therefore it is not published. > > > > Sorry there are plenty of instances where work is published without > > the author > > attaining payment for the work, consider the publication of medical > > research > > for instance (ie a study on the reason that belly button lint is very > > often > > blue/gray in colour :-) > > > > Rob Studdert > > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ > > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > >
