> > keller.schaefer wrote: > > ks> (correct me if I am wrong). So everything that a lens can possible deliver over > ks> 64 lp/mm is wasted on the sensor by definition. The REAL resolving power of the > ks> sensor will be (way) below that due to the geometry of the sensor pixels, maybe > ks> somewhere around 40. > > According to the Nyquist theorem the maximum resolution the sensor > can sample accurately is half its resolution. This brings down the > resolving power to 32 lpmm. Roughly the same as a 2800 dpi scanner. > ` > Servus, Alin >
- Re: FA 31 mm 1.8 limited Herb Chong
- Re: FA 31 mm 1.8 limited Herb Chong
- Re: FA 31 mm 1.8 limited John Francis
- Re: FA 31 mm 1.8 limited graywolf
- Re: FA 31 mm 1.8 limited William Robb
- RE: FA 31 mm 1.8 limited Cesar Matamoros II
- Re: FA 31 mm 1.8 limited Pat
- Re: FA 31 mm 1.8 limited Mark Roberts
- Re[2]: FA 31 mm 1.8 limited Pat
- Re[3]: FA 31 mm 1.8 limited Bruce Dayton
- Re: FA 31 mm 1.8 limited John Francis
- Re: FA 31 mm 1.8 limited Peter Jordan
- Re[3]: FA 31 mm 1.8 limited Pat
- Re: FA 31 mm 1.8 limited Rob Studdert
- Re: FA 31 mm 1.8 limited John Francis
- Re: FA 31 mm 1.8 limited Rob Studdert
- Re: FA 31 mm 1.8 limited Rob Studdert
- Re: FA 31 mm 1.8 limited Herb Chong
- No longer at all about:the FA 31 mm 1.8 limited, ... William Robb

