On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 01:05:19 -0800, Bruce Dayton wrote: > Well, 28 is visually wider than 35. If you are going for a wider > look, then you should probably get the 28 and just be sure to stop > down a bit. I know how that "finances" thing can get in the way of > wants. Good luck.
Oh those pesky finances. If I want wider, I'll go FA 28mm. Stopping the lens down would defeat the low light capability that I'm also looking for, wouldn't it? Looks like if I want lower light, I'll go FA 35mm. Thanks, Pat in SF __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/
