At my son's wedding last year I ran out of Portra just before the wedding 
dance and had to fall back on Gold 200 for the reception and dance 
shots.  The Portra shots came back from the lab just as I expected, great 
skin tones, less contrast, great detail, your typical wedding photography 
color palette.  The Gold 200 shots of the reception  and dance had great 
color saturation and vibrancy, skin tones were over tanned but actually it 
made for a good party film because the increased color saturation really 
picked up the color of the balloons and other decorations.  I can see why 
the UK magazine Practical Photography picked it as their favorite 200 speed 
color print film last year.

DG



At 10:04 PM 3/20/01 -0500, you wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >   Phillippe.....
> >      Don't be such a wimp....get in there with your 35mm !!!
> >   Seriously...look thru actual wedding albums and magazines
> >   for inspiration and unusual angles, interview the couple to
> >   see what THEY want (hint)...then shoot loads of Kodak Gold
> >   200 asa.....
>
>Gold 200? Why would you use this over Portra or one of the Fuji's?
>
>tv
>-
>This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
>go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
>visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to