Water vapor is a much more efficient "greenhouse gas" and is two orders of
magnitude more plentiful than CO2 in our atmosphere. (Perhaps we should
rethink those fuel cell cars!)
I�m aware of this.
If we are in a global warming crisis today, even the most aggressive and
costly proposals for limiting industrial carbon dioxide emissions would have
a negligible effect on global climate!
I know this too, I have some background in the field from the scientific side.
Don't be one of the sheeple. Just because someone spits out some number that
seems alarmingly large to you in comparison to your daily references doesn't
mean it's significant. Ninety three million miles seems like a large
number - until you compare it with the distance to Sol's nearest neighbor.
I�m not one of the sheeple, but from my point of view you might as well be one of them. I�m sensing denial, and we�ve heard this before. In Norway we had acid rain transported here from central Europe for decades before the denial stopped and someone did something. It helped, a lot.
Anyway, I�m not saying we have a greenhouse effect. It is not unlikely, so I like to be on the safe side. Pollution is too much on anything in the same place, so we would be better off with variation.
DagT
PS: on the other hand.
Norway makes a good living on oil export, and it�s cold here most of the year. Why not, a more temperate climate would be nice, we wouldn�t loose much land to the sea, and we wouldn�t loose our main income. So go ahead!
:-)
