On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 23:16:56 +0200, you wrote:
snip
>... then concludes that any higher resolution scan of the film is
>therefore fruitless. They don't seem to realize there's smaller grains yet
>to be resolved, after the first big one's they thought you saw.

Wow. More grain. Just what I wanted. Can't wait to resolve right down
to the atoms. Bet film has more atoms than digital, too.

Seriously, there is lots of fine talk and hair splitting and techno
info, which I find fascinating and informative.  However, it seems a
lot of PDMLers have mostly quit using film, not by initial choice or
plan, but because they bought a digicam or DSLR of 5-10 mp, and as
they used it came to realize its digital sensor resolution provides
very satisfactory results for the most of their photo needs.

By the way - where the heck is Pal now that the *istD has arrived?
Where are ya, ol' friend? Hope you didn't slip off that Zodiak with
the 600/4 anchored to you... 

--
John Mustarde
www.photolin.com

Reply via email to