Bruce Dayton wrote:
> My local labs no longer do analog. That means that my film is at a
> disadvantage. It is subject to their scanner/software limitations.
> The only alternative is to scan and manipulate the images myself.
Same here - and to make things even worse, they have their
printing machinery set well into the lower scan resolutions
in the intrest of fast turnaround. Haven't been able to get
decent film printing locally for several years now. The 3week
turnaround for quality "real" photofinishing from an excellent
lab all the way across the North American continent has basicly
quashed any income potential from the sort of photographic
product I would want my name on. After years of "dumbing-down"
of the potential client base to the acceptance of mediocrity,
photography has been reduced to a lowest cost commodity - just
as George Eastman hoped for years ago! ;^)
Bill
---------------------------------------------------------
Bill D. Casselberry ; Photography on the Oregon Coast
http://www.orednet.org/~bcasselb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------
