Re: What do you think?

[Paul Stenquist]

You're right, there is usually a lot of digital manipulation of the 
film images, even if its  just a matter of tiny details like removing 
or extending a highlight, enriching blacks, etc. I think what Bob was 
saying was that the transparencies that result from such highly 
controlled shoots are nearly perfect, and that too is correct.

On Dec 24, 2003, at 11:18 PM, Herb Chong wrote:

you are being extremely foolish if you believe the transparency doesn't
undergo manipulation to get it to print right. i work with the print 
side of
the trade. what can be done on film can be done in digitally if they 
take
the trouble to, including making it look like any specific film you 
want
from any specific format and through any particular lens.

Herb...
----- Original Message -----
From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 10:34 PM
Subject: Re: What do you think?

Also, they control everything about the shoot so thoroughly that that 
big
virgin
tranny needs no manipulation prior to prepress. And therefore there 
is no
economic advantage to shooting digitally.