Hi!

g> As I said subtile. The emotional undercurrent in a photo is far more important
g> than most photographers seem to realize.

I am afraid I am going to admit that I still have to start scratching
the surface of that.

g> Is he? Or is he explaining, or is he arguing. The feeling from the photo is that
g> he is defensive about it somehow. That comes from the leaning back tilt of the 
g> photo. And, I do not think that was what Boris had in mind. As it is the photo 
g> is ambiguous, but it is not ambiguous enough to seem deliberately ambiguous.

As I said, it was not deliberate and I did not have time to think all
of this shot through. It came out this way and I suppose I missed it
to a point (above).

g> GRIN! (For folks who have not looked at it Boris's photo is of a guy racking
g> pool balls, not pornography). Do they both have to be in focus? I think not, you 
g> can change the meaning of the photograph simply by selective focus. Is it a 
g> photo of a guy playing pool? Or it a photo of a pool game with a player in the 
g> back ground? See what I mean?

Tom, I really wanted to have them both in focus as my thought was that
this guy is explaining about this ball... I think it was shot at f/5.6
or even f/8...

g> Boris's photo is actually an excellent teaching vehicle, as it is a good 
g> snapshot, the value is in learning how it could be a powerful photograph.

Now I am flattered <g>...

g> I think folks are now seeing why I do not generally critique photos. But I felt
g> Boris was asking for instruction rather than praise. However, everybody note, 
g> that I did not tell him to use a different viewpoint, or angle, or distance. 
g> That would be telling him to make a different picture, not how to improve the 
g> one he chose to make.

Indeed, I was asking for instruction. Actually, I am almost always
asking for instruction. As my aim is to improve. On all aspects of the
photography (including some funny sentences related to balls <g>)...
Seriously, I'd much rather get an instruction like this instead of
infinite number of ohs and wows without any specific word except the
exclamation marks...

But again, it is me only...

Boris

Reply via email to